Workouts at Work

Discussions about physical activity and exercise, both for people with diabetes and more generally, tend to focus on finding the time to exercise and making it more enjoyable. This is certainly true here at Diabetes Self-Management, where we’ve published articles like “Getting Started Exercising” and “Making Exercise More Fun.” But according to a recent study, leisure time might not be the best focus when it comes to increasing levels of physical activity.

The study, which was presented at the Obesity Society’s Annual Scientific Meeting in San Antonio last month (and is not yet published), examined physical activity levels over a number of years in the United States, the United Kingdom, China, Brazil, and India. According to an article on the study at MedPage Today, unlike many surveys used to gauge activity levels in a population sample, the ones used in this study asked respondents what kinds of physical activity they did in a variety of situations, including at work, doing household chores, and for transportation, in addition to time set aside for exercise. The results show that in all countries, but especially in China, overall physical activity has dropped and is projected to continue to fall. In all countries, most of this decline was the result of less job-related physical activity, with less household- and transportation-related activity as well. Leisure-time physical activity actually rose, but not enough to make up for the decline in the other areas.

Advertisement

Perhaps not surprisingly, the United States was found to have the lowest overall level of average physical activity, at 160 metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours per week. This measurement makes most sense when making comparisons: For instance, the average level of physical activity in the United States was 235 MET-hours in 1965. In the United Kingdom, average physical activity has dropped from 216 MET-hours per week in 1960 to 173 in 2005. And in China, the level has dropped dramatically from 399 MET-hours in 1991 to 213 in 2009.

Of course, it may be a good thing for overall health and safety that less back-breaking manual labor is being performed worldwide. But the drop in transportation- and chore-related activity hint at the growth of a sedentary culture in all of these countries, aided by technology — even for people without jobs involving high levels of manual labor. After all, workers in office buildings once had to walk around to relay messages. And even for “manual” jobs, such as those in shipping and distribution, machines have reduced the physical intensity of many jobs.

Have you experienced or witnessed a drop in on-the-job physical activity throughout your life? Do you think this trend is inevitable, or are there ways to incorporate more movement into sedentary jobs? Should companies be encouraged, or required, to provide equipment to encourage movement, such as treadmill-equipped work stations? Would you rather be physically active at work, commuting, doing household chores, or through leisure-time exercise? Leave a comment below! And check out these tips from the Joslin Diabetes Center on getting more physical activity.

  • Jacqueline S

    I would much rather get most of my “required” physical activity in during the day or while doing chores. I work an office job, so I started setting an online timer to get up after every 55 minutes of sitting at my desk. I then walk around, stretch, climb the stairs or go get water for 5 minutes. That is equivalent to 40 mins a day of low to moderate intensity activity, plus it keeps me alert while doing my work.

  • jim snell

    yes and as the caloric input from improved grains, better refined foods, and 24/7 availability of the stuff combined with the reduced work, type 2 diabetes has soared around the world.

    Yet, food standard caloric daily amounts remain static and in my opinion way too high.

    The hunter gatherer body was optimized years ago, thousands for that matter, liitle real gene so far or change to do physical work – lots and poor quality food with frequent brownout of the supplies.

    The body has many ways to cope from shortages – burn fat, burn muscles yet has no real control mechnaisim to prevent flooding and overloading the body with liquid energy and causing rotting out of the body by excess glucose in the blood system – none – only external control by the human.

    In fact, my read of the human body stratagies is to eat up in times of plenty and coast thru lean times using up stored supplies.

    Simply the wrong stratagy in a 24hour/7day constant supply of rich grains, rich food, refined foods and low exercise. A deadly combination for excess type 2 rot out.

    Meanwhile science is off looking for the holy grail and silver bullits to kill vampires on a single shot while refusing to see if the ancient ole hunter gatherer body gene set is being optimnally run given the circumstances.