![]() | www.DiabetesSelfManagement.com |
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu | |
|
URL:
http://www.diabetesselfmanagement.com/blog/tara-dairman/chromium_supplements_show_little_benefit_in_new_study/print/
|
|
Chromium Supplements Show Little Benefit in New StudyTara Dairman May 25, 2007 As dietitian Amy Campbell stated in her blog entry “Chromium Confusion,” the research on whether supplements of the mineral chromium can help people control their diabetes is “ever-changing.” Now the latest research on the topic, published in the May 2007 issue of Diabetes Care, has concluded that chromium supplementation is probably not helpful for most people with Type 2 diabetes. In the study, which took place in the Netherlands, 56 people with Type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to receive either 400 micrograms of chromium yeast per day or a placebo (inactive pill). The study was double-blind, meaning that neither the participants nor the researchers knew who was receiving which treatment. At the start of the experiment, all participants had HbA1c levels of 7% to 8.5% and were treated with oral diabetes drugs. Participants’ fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c levels, blood pressure, body fat percentage, body-mass index, lipid profile (cholesterol and triglycerides), and insulin resistance were all measured three months and six months into the study. No differences were found at either point in any of these measures between the people who received chromium and the people who didn’t. The researchers concluded that, at least in a Western population with relatively low HbA1c values, chromium supplementation has no added benefit as a diabetes therapy. The researchers hypothesize that this may be because most people in Western countries are able to get enough chromium from the food they eat. They say that further research is needed to develop a way to test people for chromium deficiency, in which case chromium supplements might be useful for enhancing diabetes control. Disclaimer of Medical Advice:You understand that the blogs posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents, bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind and you should not rely on any information contained on such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor. | |
Comments:
always looking for current updates ondiabetes.plus nutrition and eating habits.
Posted by: gypseyjoe | May 30, 2007 02:12 PM
Thank you for this article...some of the patients I see are always looking for quick fixes and spending money when they should save it....this will help me to talk to them...I hope the Diabetic Public understands that Diabetes has no quick fixes...it is a daily process we with Diabetes have to live with and it is up to us to do this....
Thanks,
Janice s Wong
Posted by: Janice S. Wong R.N CDE | Jun 03, 2007 02:54 PM
SINCE STARTING TO EAT 2 DRIED FIGS WITH EVERY MEAL I HAVE NOT HAD A POOR GLUCOSE READING. STRONGLY SUGGEST EVERYONE TRIES IT, IT IS DIFFICULT TO VISUALISE IT DOING ANY HARM
Posted by: Melvyn Lindley | Jul 12, 2007 04:51 AM
I have wasted lot of time and resources trying with Chromium.
Posted by: akk | Jul 27, 2007 09:58 AM
According to "Chromium Picolinate Everything you Need to Know" by Dr. Gary Evans research done on forms of chromium other than picolinate show no reason to try them. He says there is something about chromium picolinate that isn't there in either chromium or picolinate by themselves but the combination proved helpful in his research.
Here again we have a report on a chromium study that is not pointing out the form of chromium was chromium yeast.
The study, which can be found at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/30/9/e102
states a very different conclusion than what we read in the article above: that is chromium yeast is ineffective. This is not the same as saying, as above, that "chromium supplementation is probably not helpful" .
Keep this straight as it's very important. If you want to understand my point read this page as this guy seems to have already done all the homework: http://www.benbest.com/nutrceut/Chromium.html
Posted by: velvetglass | May 17, 2008 12:21 PM
I totally agree with velvetglass. I am diabetic, my treatment is metformin + pioglitazone + chromium picolinate ( 300 mcg daily )under my physician supervision. Two weeks after,I took half dose of M+P. My blood sugar is better and my mood too. And less side effects. Every day of course I control my fasting blood sugar which is normal.
Posted by: Cordier Alain | Jun 05, 2009 03:24 AM
It's my experience. After consuming the supplement chromium picolinate 200mcg dose 2 times per day for 1 month, my blood glucosa down significantly. thanks.
Posted by: Subagio W | Apr 15, 2010 09:51 PM
One shouldn't generalize negatively (or positively!) as the result of one study (or one blog post), as there are many variables for which one must account (e.g., type of chromium - chromium picolinate, chromium chloride, etc.), dosage, etc. For a more comprehensive article about chromium, please see the article at Diabetes Care which references at least 80 studies/publications re: Chromium and its efficacy. http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/27/11/2741.full?ijkey=e836956c0028b084c2741ca34304bf42f7eaf15f&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha
Posted by: autodidact | May 01, 2010 12:19 PM
This is what I thought the whole time!!!! thank you for posting this :)
Posted by: Gil | Nov 23, 2010 02:12 PM
Thank you for this article…some of the patients I see are always looking for quick fixes and spending money when they should save it…
Posted by: Bill | Dec 17, 2010 03:04 PM