Diabetes Self-Management Blog

Recently, I was watching a debate on one of those cable news shows about the increased taxes on cigarettes when one of the guests said, "…and I wouldn’t mind if they taxed obesity next."

Then came the announcement that United Airlines was instituting an obese-passenger policy, which garnered a slew of comments from readers when it was presented in Diabetes Self-Management’s Flashpoints section on April 20.

Was that the end of it? No. The Lancet, a British general medical journal, then ran a letter alleging that overweight people contributed to global warming, with United Kingdom researchers opining that fat people caused more oil consumption, more food production, and a resultant increase in the release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

Gee. Obesity seems to be at fault for everything!

One of my favorite drawings that depicts just how obesity is at the root of all of our woes appeared in The New York Times a couple of years ago (see it here). In a Rube Goldberg-ish sequence of events, an overweight man eats a piece of cake, causing a button to pop off his shirt, turning on a propane torch that causes global warming. That, in turn, heats up water which kills endangered species. However, the condensed water does cause a flower to grow…which tips over a box filled with nuclear secrets. The secrets fall into the hands of a spy, leading to nuclear proliferation. As the spy runs away on a treadmill, a buzz saw is activated which cuts down a Brazilian rain forest.

No wonder “they” want to get rid of obesity. Gotta end nuclear proliferation and save the Brazilian rain forests, ya know.

OK, I get it. Obesity isn’t good for you. But society assumes that obesity is something people do to themselves and, if we’d only stop that fork from reaching our mouths, we’d all be svelte. There’s more to it than that: Genetics, certain medications, life experiences, and more all contribute to obesity. Those are factors that (1) may not be understood or (2) may not have been researched enough because it’s easier to blame the victim.

I was sitting out on the front porch a little while ago, thinking about my family. I’m the largest and my father is number two. Then come my size-8 mother and my tall, lanky brothers. Once, when Dad was complaining about his weight, Mom said, “We all eat at the same table.”

Then I glanced over at the cats, who were lounging on various surfaces, looking for the birds they could hear but couldn’t see. Three of the four are from the same litter. The litter mates all began life within three grams of the same weight. One is now about twice as large as his siblings. Judging from the kittens’ markings, he has the same father as at least one of his siblings. He’s as active as the others. He cannot go to a drive-through and order the heart-attack special, nor can he go to the grocery store and stock up on ice cream and potato chips. He eats from the same bowl.

Fat-bashing seems to be the last bastion of social acceptability. Race is out. Religion is out. Sexism is a no-no. But comedians, celebrities, and run-of-the-mill people are free to lash out at large people. (And, incidentally, at those who have Type 2 diabetes, which goes hand-in-hand with being overweight — although most people who are overweight do not have diabetes).

Do “they” believe they are helping by bashing overweight and obesity? Perhaps by surmising that it will cause overweight people to lose weight? Surprisingly, a report in the October 2006 issue of the journal Obesity found that people coped with the stress of being stigmatized about their weight by…eating more and refusing to diet.

People have been fired for making comments about off-limits topics. It may have something to do with political correctness, but I like to think it’s more about the fact that there are human beings beneath skin color, gender, and other off-limit topics. I wish those who make inappropriate comments about weight would remember the human factor, too.

Somehow, this blog had its own ideas about where it wanted to go as I was writing it. I wanted to include a quote about obesity and global warming from Rebecca M. Puhl, PhD, director of research and weight stigma initiatives at Yale University’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity. But, hey, nothing wrong with ending with her comments:

“Body weight has very little to do with one’s environmental footprint. For example, there are many obese individuals who drive small cars or take public transportation to work, who recycle as part of their daily lifestyles, buy locally grown foods, and find ways to conserve energy. There are also many ‘thin’ people who don¹t do these things.

“These studies only serve to perpetuate the stigma and prejudice that obese persons already face, and deflect attention from the more serious contributors of food-related contributions to global warming, such as industrialized food production and the food distribution system (e.g., how many gallons of aviation fuel are burned to get fresh produce to our supermarkets? Or to package food products in plastics and ship them daily all over the world?).

“Rather than focusing on how much energy is expended by carrying extra body mass, we should be focusing on ways to improve our agricultural practices and food environment as a way of addressing both ‘globesity’ and climate change.”

Isn’t it amazing what you can dig up if you just go beyond the surface?

POST A COMMENT       
  

Comments
  1. If you are heavy as I have been all my life, you are society’s “cootie” forever - even after you lose weight to a “normal” (whatever that is) size. Unless you can find all pictures and blank the memory of the populace, you are screwed forever more.

    Being heavy is not the cause of anything, other than genetics that you may pass on to your children.

    Posted by alwaysheavy |
  2. Dear Jan.

    If they would stop stressing us out we might be able to loose some weight. cortisol is a major factor in obesity and diabetes at the same time.

    Can’t america go back to hating Commies or are the Chinese big business now. Plus they buy US treasuries at times.

    Posted by CalgaryDiabetic |
  3. Jan,
    This reminded me of a meeting I was in today on our insurance through work. We have to sign papers in Oct. saying if we are tobacco users or not. If we are, we will be paying $50 more a month for our insurance. Happily, I am not a user. But I can clearly see how smoking and tobacco use affects our health and, thus, causes us to be more of a medical risk. The increase in insurance payments for smokers is a great incentive for them to quit—also the insurance is giving them a very low co-pay on patches, pills, etc. to help them stop smoking and also offering personal counseling. This makes sense to a non-smoker.

    Then someone asked the question, “What are they going to charge us for next?” Yes, you guessed it! The lady said there was a mention of increased rates for “obese people.” But that was a ways into the future and might not ever be done. Wow, you should have heard the crowd’s reaction. Everyone was saying that ruling would probably affect as many as 80% of the employees and how could they say who was overweight enough to be a health risk. Some even went on to say the insurance company was turning us into a “Socialist Country.” Yeah, when it comes to telling people to lose weight, things can get ugly.

    I know obesity is not good for anyone but I also know how difficult it is to try to lose weight. Someday in the future our insurance may see fit to give us an added incentive to lose weight by charging us more. What are your ideas on this?

    Posted by Fossil Lady |
  4. I would first require that I be given the weight and BMI of all the insurance company’s employees. :-)

    Seriously, if it were that easy to lose weight, would there be a lot of overweight people? It isn’t that easy to lose pounds or to keep them off and many factors influence weight besides overeating and under-exercising. Somewhere, sometime, I read something about it being impossible to do a study comparing overweight people who had dieted and those who hadn’t, because researchers couldn’t find an overweight person who had never dieted.

    Would restaurants ban overweight people from eating at their establishments? Would the “fat police” hover over you at restaurants and grocery stores, telling people they can’t have “that?”

    Bottom line: I think it would really stink to have a policy like that. I hope it never happens.

    Jan

    Posted by Jan Chait |
  5. Thinking about it… it makes sense. Overweight people don’t exercise, so they travel by car more often. (Oil Issues) The fatter someone is the more they consume adding to the consumerism factors. Basically the more a person consumes the more resources are used..and the bigger a person is the more intake. Its a cycle.

    Posted by Jacob |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of R.A. Rapaport Publishing, Inc., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.


Weight Loss
Overweight People With Type 2 May Benefit From Gastric Banding (04/11/14)
FDA Panel Votes in Favor of Inhalable Insulin; Diet Drug Recalled (04/09/14)
Unconventional Ways to Lose Weight…Maybe (03/17/14)
Why Are Animals Getting Fat? (01/28/14)

General Diabetes & Health Issues
Will Spring Ever Arrive? (04/08/14)
"We'll All Get Old If We Live Long Enough" (04/02/14)
What Is Your Urine Trying to Tell You? (03/28/14)
No, This Is Not What "Spring Forward" Means (03/18/14)

Emotional Health
Worried About Diabetes? (03/26/14)
Diabetes Takes Courage (02/19/14)
The Stress Formula (02/04/14)
It's Not All in Your Head (But Your Head Can Help) (01/16/14)

 

 

Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.


Carbohydrate Restriction: An Option for Diabetes Management
Some people find that decreasing the amount of carbohydrate they eat can help with blood glucose control. Here’s what to know about this approach.

Insulin Patch Pumps: A New Tool for Type 2
Patch pumps are simpler to operate than traditional insulin pumps and may be a good option for some people with Type 2 diabetes who need insulin.

How Much Do You Know About Vitamins?
Learn what these micronutrients can and can’t do for you.

Complete table of contents
Get a FREE ISSUE
Subscription questions