Diabetes Self-Management Blog

Amid all the discussion of the economy, foreign policy, and social issues this election season, the role of the federal government in shaping the country’s health-care system is not getting the attention many people thought it would — especially since opposition to the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) played a large role in the Republican takeover of the House of Representatives two years ago. But just because health care isn’t always in the spotlight doesn’t mean the stakes are any lower, or the controversies any less heated, than they were in 2010. The actions of Congress and the president over the next few years could greatly shape the course of health care for people with diabetes.

The area in which federal health-care policy is perhaps most uncertain is still the Affordable Care Act itself. President Obama, of course, supports the law and would oppose any attempt by Congress to repeal it, just as most Democrats in Congress support the core elements of the law (which are set to go into effect in 2014). These core elements include establishing state-based insurance exchanges through which people without employer-provided or other group health insurance plans can buy private health insurance; requiring that insurance plans on these exchanges accept all applicants, regardless of preexisting medical conditions; providing subsidies, based on income level, to make health insurance purchased on exchanges more affordable; and requiring that nearly all Americans have comprehensive health insurance of some kind. In principle, at least, requiring nearly everyone to have health insurance will lead to lower premiums, since more healthy people will be part of insurance pools.

Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee for president, has vowed to work to repeal the Affordable Care Act, as have most Republican candidates for Congress. In explaining his opposition to the law, Romney often notes that it requires certain businesses to pay a penalty if they do not provide health-insurance plans to employees; this is one way the law pays for subsidies to individuals buying insurance on state exchanges. Romney favors giving states more control over health-care regulation, meaning that some states might enact plans similar to the Affordable Care Act (as Romney did as governor of Massachusetts) but that many would not. Rather than supporting subsidies for lower-income families and individuals to buy health insurance, Romney supports a federal tax credit that would reduce some of the cost of health insurance. For those with truly low incomes, however, such a credit would most likely still leave insurance unaffordable. Romney also only favors requiring insurers to accept applicants with preexisting conditions if they have continuous insurance coverage, which leaves out many who currently lack health insurance as well as anyone who might be unable to pay for continuous coverage because of financial hardship caused by a job loss or similar event.

The candidates also disagree on the direction of Medicaid, the joint federal-state public insurance program for the poor (which also covers nursing-home coverage for the elderly who lack sufficient finances). Obama supported the expansion of Medicaid to anyone earning up to 133% of the federal poverty line, which is a provision in the Affordable Care Act that states can opt out of, thanks to a US Supreme Court ruling. Romney opposes this Medicaid expansion and would furthermore drastically change the existing program, ending federal rules governing eligibility and coverage and instead giving states complete flexibility to cover their poor residents as they choose.

Medicare, the federal public insurance program that covers all senior citizens, has seen some changes in its structure under the Affordable Care Act, with the support of President Obama. The prescription-drug coverage gap in Medicare Part D (often called the “doughnut hole”), under which many seniors have had to pay the full cost for all drugs out-of-pocket, was eliminated in the law. The law also, however, cut approximately $700 billion in hospital reimbursements and private-insurance subsidies from the Medicare program. While these cuts did not affect the benefits of people enrolled in Medicare, many Republicans claim that the cuts could lead to health-care providers becoming less accepting of Medicare patients. Romney promises to restore this funding to Medicare. He also supports changing the program so that future enrollees (those currently under 55 years old) can either choose the current Medicare system or receive a voucher from the government with which they could buy private insurance.

Will your views on federal health-care programs be a major factor in how you vote next week? Do you see either Obama’s or Romney’s plans changing your diabetes care for the better, or for the worse? Do you rely on either Medicare or Medicaid, or do you anticipate gaining coverage through the Affordable Care Act? Do you support any of the proposed changes to these programs? Leave a comment below, and don’t forget to vote on Tuesday, November 6!

POST A COMMENT       
  

Comments
  1. Hi,i have read your articles. it is a fantastic one. You have done well. I have gote some advantages
    from it. I think that it is an important contemporary issue.some of your topic are very well which have attracted me much.I think our country(Bangladesh)doctor not very sincere.Because your articles so good.I hope your articles will be helpful for the people.

    Posted by MD SAHABUL HOSSAIN |
  2. I also read the well written article. However, I question why I rec’d it today, Nov. 7, the day after the election when it was dated Oct. 31, six days before the election? It would not have affected my vote since I support Pres. Obama and the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare). Thanks for the article, but please be more timely.
    Ron Timmons, Indianapolis

    Posted by Ron Timmons |
  3. Yes, I fully support the Affordable Care Act[ACA] and voted accordingly. Medicare and Medicaid are very necessary. Medicare helps me a great deal with my pump and the needed supplies for the pump AND also the meds needed as a Type 1 for 55 years. Quite frankly, I was very concerned until I heard Tuesday night’s national election results.

    Both Medicare and Medicaid need adjustments as time passes. And most state and federal government dept. adjust over time. Hopefully a threat to take away these much needed health care systems will not happen again, ever!!! Especially the pre exiting clause within the ACA that will help so very many diabetics, and other citizens with chronic diseases.

    Posted by joan |
  4. Just wait a while and you will see how bad all this is for the country. I am in the throw away age and there will be “death panels” to decide how not to treat “units”. This scares me to death.

    Posted by Ferne |
  5. The affordable health care act is an important bill for us senior diabetics. Had Obama not been re-elected we would have been put at a great disadvantage with the repeal of this legislation
    ! No insurer would would have to accept us for coverage nor would the so called flat rate voucher to buy Medicare insurance require any of the insurance companies to insure us at their regular rate and we would all nave to pay thousands a year if not month to get any kind of insurance!This bill ,the AHA,guarantees that these companies accept our pre-existing condition whereas Romney-Ryan plans had no such provision. This act is by no means perfect but is an important starting point

    Posted by Dan Kashefska |
  6. Maybe I am selfish, but I went on Medicare this year and am not happy with it! I have been T1D for 53 years and until I was forced to go on Medicare or loose my other coverage, I had never had trouble with coverage for the various “goodies” needed to maintain good control. They won’t cover CGMS, and want to limit the number of test strips I use each month. The government has not been exceptionally successful in other attempts to control aspects of our lives. Why do we think they can be successful with health coverage? I think we should be very careful before we give our health care over to a system that cannot meet its own budget and keeps raising our national debt. How are they (you) going to pay for this?

    Posted by Trudi Peters |
  7. I think those who supported obama and the health care law are going to be sorely disappointed. The very fact that we have diabetes, especially type 1 puts us in a bad category should we break a hip after the age of 75. The panel will look at the life span we have after age 75 for any needed surgery and let’s face it, it is not as good as those who do not have diabetes. I think you all made a grave mistake.

    Posted by Diane |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of R.A. Rapaport Publishing, Inc., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.


Flashpoints
The Costs of Innovation (04/09/14)
Diabetes to Go (04/02/14)
Veggie Persuasion (03/26/14)
(Un)healthy States of America (03/19/14)

 

 

Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.


Carbohydrate Restriction: An Option for Diabetes Management
Some people find that decreasing the amount of carbohydrate they eat can help with blood glucose control. Here’s what to know about this approach.

Insulin Patch Pumps: A New Tool for Type 2
Patch pumps are simpler to operate than traditional insulin pumps and may be a good option for some people with Type 2 diabetes who need insulin.

How Much Do You Know About Vitamins?
Learn what these micronutrients can and can’t do for you.

Complete table of contents
Get a FREE ISSUE
Subscription questions