Diabetes Self-Management Blog

For years, the so-called Mediterranean diet has been promoted as a heart-healthy way of eating. Following a Mediterranean diet generally means consuming whole grains, fish, olive oil, nuts and seeds, and fruits and vegetables in abundance; dairy, eggs, and wine in low to moderate amounts; and red meat and concentrated sugars in low amounts. It is based on typical food consumption patterns in parts of the Mediterranean region — particularly areas of Greece — studied in the early 1960s, and it has been found in studies to be associated with a lower rate of heart disease. Studies have also shown it to be beneficial for diabetes control.

Now, however, a competitor has emerged: the Southern European Atlantic Diet, or SEAD. This diet refers to a style of eating common in northern Portugal and northwestern Spain, on the Atlantic coast. As reported in a Reuters article, researchers noticed that residents of this region experienced a low rate of death from heart disease and undertook a study to find out how big of a role the regional diet played in this phenomenon. The subjects were 820 people who had been hospitalized for a heart attack, as well as 2,196 people from the same geographic area who were randomly selected for the study. All participants filled out questionnaires focusing on their food habits in the previous year. Based on his responses, each participant was then rated as above or below the median consumption level in nine areas believed to constitute the pillars of the SEAD: cod fish, all other fresh fish, red meat and pork, dairy, legumes and vegetables, vegetable soup, potatoes, whole-grain bread, and wine. For each food category in which a participant had below-median consumption he was given a “zero,” and for each category with above-median consumption, a “one.” Each participant thus received a score on a nine-point scale reflecting adherence to the SEAD.

The researchers discovered that on average, a one-point increase on the SEAD scale was associated with a 10% reduction in heart attack risk. The heart attack risk of the top 25% of participants on the SEAD scale was 33% lower than the risk of the bottom 25%.

However, the researchers discovered that above-median consumption of two of their nine SEAD components — red meat and pork, and potatoes — increased rather than decreased the risk of heart attack. By reversing the scoring on these two categories — that is, giving a “zero” for above-median consumption and a “one” for below-median consumption — to create a new scale, they found an even greater dietary benefit. The top 25% of participants on this new scale had a heart attack risk 60% lower than that of the bottom 25% of participants.

This second part of the study indicates that the traditional SEAD is not necessarily the best diet for cardiovascular protection. Lower consumption of red meat and potatoes may in fact be responsible for the added benefit seen in the modified SEAD, but the study has several weaknesses that mean it may not. For example, other factors that were not measured — such as overall health-consciousness or following traditional ways of living — could have affected both the diet and the heart attack risk of participants.

It should also be emphasized that participants were scored only on whether their consumption in each food category was above or below the median. This means that any nonlinear effect — such as a risk of heart attack that increases both with very high or very low consumption of a food category — would not have come to light in the study, so no food category can be categorized as helpful in very large amounts or as so harmful that it should be heavily reduced or eliminated from the diet.

But if the modified version of the SEAD does, in fact, offer substantial protection against heart attacks, does it represent anything new in dietary advice? Could a lower overall glycemic index from the elimination of potatoes be partially responsible for the benefit? Do you see an overall pattern to be followed in both the Mediterranean diet and the SEAD (regular or modified)? Would you find either of these diets appetizing or easy to stick to? Leave a comment below!

POST A COMMENT       
  

Comments
  1. It seems to me that when a study is limited to a given country, the genetic effect is probably important.

    Posted by Heartha Whitlow |
  2. When one considers the European food laws governing the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and compares them to the way our vegetables are grown and when thinking their fish comes from the Atlantic ocean, not from fish farms, one wonders if those factors could have an influence on the study results.

    Posted by Erika Hannemann |
  3. Living with Type 1 for almost 53 years I have found it to be true, at least for me, that what I should eat or do eat, how I control carbs or not, and weight gain depends on my metabolic system. What works for me may not work for others, and vice versa! Regional areas and genes may also make a difference. In more hot climates daily life moves a bit slower which could also be helpful to the heart! Stress, and life style…it all adds up to what we do individually that works for just us, as an individual.

    Posted by joan |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of Madavor Media, LLC., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.


Flashpoints
Control Solution = Better Control? (08/27/14)
Candy-Carrying Crisis (08/20/14)
Processed = Bad? (08/13/14)
Pills vs. Programs (08/06/14)

 

 

Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.