Diabetes Self-Management Blog

For what seems like ages, carbohydrate counting has been the standard way to calculate mealtime insulin doses for people with diabetes who take insulin. By applying your personal insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio and taking your premeal blood glucose level into account, counting carbs can help you dose your insulin to achieve tight blood glucose control while minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia (low blood glucose). Carb counting has spread beyond just people who take insulin; it is now widely used as a general meal-planning tool for people with diabetes.

But according to a recent review of research on the subject, counting carbs may not live up to its reputation when it comes to blood glucose control. Published late last month by The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, the review sifted through 311 studies to find seven that lasted at least three months and compared carb counting with “general or alternate dietary advice” in people with Type 1 diabetes. According to an article on the review by MedPage Today, five of the previously published studies found carb counting to result in lower HbA1c levels (a measure of long-term blood glucose control) by an average of 0.64%, while two studies found that alternative, rougher methods of calculating insulin doses worked just as well or better. When data from all seven studies were combined — resulting in a subject pool of 599 adults and 104 children with Type 1 diabetes — there was no significant difference in HbA1c between participants who were assigned to count carbs and those assigned to other methods.

As we noted in a post here at Diabetes Flashpoints two years ago, alternative ways to regulate carbohydrate in the diet include the glycemic index (GI), which rates carbohydrate-containing foods according to how quickly they raise blood glucose, and the diabetic exchange system. Very few studies, however, have compared these or any other alternative systems with carb counting. A 2003 meta-analysis (combined analysis of several studies) did, however, find an average HbA1c reduction of 0.43% associated with low-GI diets. HbA1c is, of course, not the only outcome that matters to many people: A 2008 study found that low-GI diets resulted in fewer and lower doses of diabetes drugs being prescribed, while a 2011 study found that carb counting led to a lower body-mass index (BMI) among insulin pump users than estimating mealtime insulin without counting carbs.

What do you think — has counting carbs worked for you? Have you ever compared carb counting with other methods, such as estimating carbs for insulin doses or focusing on a low-GI or low-carb diet? Do you find counting carbs to be difficult or cumbersome? If you count carbs, do you take other dietary factors, such as fat or fiber content, into account when calculating an insulin dose? Leave a comment below!

POST A COMMENT       
  

Comments
  1. If you ask me, counting exchanges is another way of counting carbs for the most part if you decide on a ratio of insulin to the starch exchanges.

    Posted by Bk |
  2. Many years ago, I was having a lot of difficulty controlling my BG. I went to an endo who told me that some people are very sensitive to carbs, and I was apparently one of them. Whether food is low glycemic or high glycemic doesn’t matter, all carbs get digested into glucose. If my BG doesn’t go up right away, it will later in the day if I don’t count my carb intake and take steps (insulin) to prevent it. Ever since my endo discussed this with me and taught me what I could do about it, my BG has mostly been between 70 and 120. Also, no doctor ever told me whether I am type 1 or 2. I was diagnosed as an adult with IDDM.

    Posted by Barbara Edwards |
  3. Because I’m not on any medication for diabetes I’ve never been told how many carbs are the limit for a day. As long as I stay between 5.0 and 6.0 my doctor is happy.

    Posted by Jean |
  4. This carb counting stuff makes me dizzy! Ugh!

    Posted by Terri |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of Madavor Media, LLC., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.


Flashpoints
Obamacare, Round 2 (09/22/14)
Added Sugars, Added Confusion (09/17/14)
Weight and Diabetes Risk (09/10/14)
Caving to Cravings (09/03/14)

 

 

Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.