Diabetes Self-Management Blog

A Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel voted on Wednesday to allow the controversial diabetes drug Avandia (rosiglitazone) to remain on the market, but about half of the panel members called for sales restrictions and/or stronger label warnings about the risk of heart attacks. The FDA, which will be reviewing the recommendations and issuing a final decision on the fate of the medicine, is not required to follow the advice of its advisory panels, but it typically does.

Avandia is in the thiazolidinedione class of diabetes medicines, which work by improving insulin sensitivity and decreasing the production of glucose by the liver. In the past few years, several studies have been published that link Avandia with a higher risk of heart problems. The medicine first came under fire in 2007 following a study showing that people using it had a 43% higher risk of heart attack and a 64% higher risk of dying from heart disease compared to people taking other common diabetes treatments. In response to that data, the FDA added a black box warning to Avandia’s packaging, noting the increased risk of heart attack, and requested that the drug’s maker, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), conduct a long-term study to evaluate Avandia’s cardiovascular risk compared to a control treatment.

More recently, in February 2010, safety concerns were raised again when David Graham, MD, MPH, associate director of drug safety at the FDA, published a report calling for Avandia’s removal from the market. The report claimed that roughly 500 more heart attacks and 300 more cases of heart failure would occur each month with the continued use of Avandia than would occur if Actos (pioglitazone), the only other drug on the market in the thiazolidinedione class, were used exclusively. In May, GSK settled roughly 700 cases brought by patients alleging that Avandia had caused their heart attacks for $60 million. And in June, two large studies published in The Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that Avandia carried an increased risk of heart failure, stroke, and death compared to Actos. Other allegations have also recently swirled around Avandia, including that GSK intimidated physicians and played down the cardiovascular risk posed by the drug, as well as that SmithKline Beecham, GSK’s corporate predecessor, concealed data from a 1999 study indicating that drug carried an increased heart risk.

In response to the FDA’s 2007 request for a long-term study evaluating Avandia’s cardiovascular risk, GSK is beginning a large trial known as Thiazolidinedione Intervention With Vitamin D Evaluation, or TIDE, comparing Avandia to Actos. The trial aims to study 16,000 people in 14 countries before the year 2015.

On Wednesday, an FDA advisory panel consisting of 33 health experts was asked to vote on a number of matters relating to the future of Avandia, including whether the TIDE trial should proceed and whether Avandia should remain on the market; the panelists heard testimony from people taking Avandia, as well as physicians and company representatives. On the question of whether Avandia should remain on the market, 12 members of the panel voted that it should be withdrawn, 10 voted that it should be allowed to remain on the market but with serious label revision and possibly sales restrictions, 7 voted to add additional warnings to the label, and 3 voted for sales to continue unchanged. (One panelist abstained.) Most who voted to keep Avandia on the market indicated that their opinion was based on a lack of solid evidence showing harm from the drug. On the matter of whether to allow the TIDE trial to continue, the panel was split 19 to 11, with the majority in favor of the study continuing. Should TIDE proceed, however, it will be several years before any results become available.

Ellen Strahlman, MD, MHSc, Chief Medical Officer for GSK, said that Avandia would remain on the market pending a decision from the FDA. She said that “Patients taking Avandia should speak with their physician about their treatment and any questions they may have regarding the safety of the medicine.” And in a joint statement by the Endocrine Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, these organizations “urge[d] patients not to make any changes to their medication use without discussing their treatment with their physician.”

To learn more about the FDA panel’s decision, see the piece “The Avandia Saga Continues.” And for more information about Avandia (and other members of the thiazolidinedione drug class), click here.


  1. I was taken off Avandia, and I had been doing great with it. I was put on Actos. It has a side effect of increased appetite which I was not aware of. I gained weight and could not seem to stop eating. I went off it when I finally figured it out and the pharmacist said that was probably the most common side effect. Most diabetics are already overweight anyway and certainly don’t need to add more!

    Posted by Patricia S. |
  2. I have been taking avandia for 8 years, and plan to continue. I read all 762 pages of material prepared for the FDA advisory committee, as well as the published papers referred to in your breaking news item, describing the results of the various clinical trials and investigations on Avandia. What no one mentions is that the increased cardio risks are still very small (eg if a risk is 1% for Actos, a 43% increase for Avandia means the increased risk is still only 1.43%.). I’m not impressed with GSK’s record of transparency. However, for me Avandia’s risks are outweighed by it’s benefits.

    Posted by David wells |
  3. I was put non Avandia as soon as it was approved by the FDA. In 2006 I suffered a stroke. I had no other risk factors, A1C under 7, blood pressure normal, cholestrol was under 100 - you do the math!

    Posted by Dee |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of Madavor Media, LLC., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.

Type 2 Diabetes
Discovering I Had Type 2 Diabetes (10/17/14)
Low-Carb Diet Improves Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetes (10/07/14)
Long Hours at Low-Income Jobs Linked to Increased Diabetes Risk (10/02/14)
Metformin Study Currently Recruiting (08/19/14)

Oral Medicines
Statins May Reduce Risk of Nerve Damage, Other Diabetes Complications (09/18/14)
New Metformin Combo Drug Approved for Type 2 Diabetes (08/13/14)
FDA Approves New Oral Drug for Type 2 Diabetes (08/07/14)
New SGLT Drugs Coming (07/23/14)

Heart Health
Self-Manage Your Blood Pressure (09/02/14)
Pistachios Offer Protection for People With Diabetes (08/29/14)
Which Butter (or Spread) Is Better? (07/28/14)
High-Salt Diet Doubles Heart Risk in Type 2 Diabetes (07/25/14)

Diane Fennell
Take Part in the Big Blue Test! (10/15/14)
Can Grapefruit Juice Prevent Weight Gain, Increase Insulin Sensitivity? (10/16/14)
Low-Carb Diet Improves Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetes (10/07/14)
Long Hours at Low-Income Jobs Linked to Increased Diabetes Risk (10/02/14)



Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.

Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring — Part 3: Smart Monitoring

10 Keys to Long-Term Weight Loss

Take Your Best Shot: Stay Up to Date on Vaccines

Complete table of contents
Subscription questions