Diabetes Self-Management Blog

A few months ago, we wrote (“Doctors in Pharma’s Pocket?”) about a report that found many common arrangements between pharmaceutical companies and doctors to constitute an unacceptable conflict of interest. These arrangements, which range from buying doctors lunch as they listen to a drug presentation, to paying for their medical “refresher” courses, are exceedingly common: A survey found that 75% of doctors accepted free meals or drug samples, and drug companies spend more on services for doctors than they do on research or on consumer advertising.

Another common — and commonly denounced — practice is for hospital and medical school officials to work on the side for pharmaceutical companies, often receiving large compensation for comparatively little work. Critics complain that these doctors will feel beholden to drug companies as they create policies that shape how thousands of doctors learn and practice their profession. Most officials themselves maintain, of course, that their professional judgment is unchanged by their sources of income.

The hospitals affiliated with Harvard Medical School, however, are no longer content to take these officials at their word. Starting this year, approximately two dozen senior staff members will have a cap placed on how much money they can earn from sitting on the boards of pharmaceutical companies. According to an article in The New York Times, these restrictions go further than those at any other academic medical center in the country. Under the new rules, officials can earn no more than $5,000 a day working on the boards of drug companies, and they must actually be working — not just holding an honorary position. The hospital group now also prohibits all employees from receiving money to speak on behalf of pharmaceutical companies, a policy that affects thousands of its doctors, and has created an office to monitor its relationship with the drug industry.

What do you think — are policies like this a step in the right direction? Or will they just make talented medical professionals more likely to leave academia for drug companies — something that regularly happens already? Would you trust a doctor who was paid to give lectures for a drug company to teach, or to evaluate patients, impartially? Leave a comment below!

POST A COMMENT       
  

Comments
  1. I certainly believe this is a step in the right direction and may there be more widely done monitoring of the relationships between physicians and drug companies as well as the tremendous influence of pharma on such organizations as American Heart Association.

    Posted by Victoria Davidson |
  2. There should be no relationship between a physian and drug companies period.

    Posted by Mario Sangregory |
  3. I’ve known this was going on for years.Drug companies also pay for the doc’s holidays with the more prescriptions they write.Why do you think there is no cure for cancer,Blood pressure or diabetes.Disease is great business for pharma companies.

    Posted by DivineLight60 |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of R.A. Rapaport Publishing, Inc., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.


Flashpoints
Doctor Payments Revealed (04/16/14)
The Costs of Innovation (04/09/14)
Diabetes to Go (04/02/14)
Veggie Persuasion (03/26/14)

 

 

Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.


Carbohydrate Restriction: An Option for Diabetes Management
Some people find that decreasing the amount of carbohydrate they eat can help with blood glucose control. Here’s what to know about this approach.

Insulin Patch Pumps: A New Tool for Type 2
Patch pumps are simpler to operate than traditional insulin pumps and may be a good option for some people with Type 2 diabetes who need insulin.

How Much Do You Know About Vitamins?
Learn what these micronutrients can and can’t do for you.

Complete table of contents
Get a FREE ISSUE
Subscription questions