Diabetes Self-Management Blog

In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s decision late last month upholding nearly all of the Affordable Care Act (often called Obamacare), it is likely that the law’s expansion of private health insurance coverage — achieved through a requirement that most people buy or obtain insurance, combined with subsidies to make it more affordable — as well as its efforts to limit overall health-care spending will remain in effect. While no one seriously questions that the law will result in expanded health coverage, many experts doubt that its various efforts will slow the rate of growth in health-care spending. And a recent report from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) — the very agency responsible for carrying out the Affordable Care Act — predicts that health-care spending will accelerate in coming years.

As a Bloomberg News article on the report notes, CMS predicts that overall health-care spending (from all sources, public and private) will grow from 17.9% of the US economy this year to 19.6% in 2021. This prediction comes in spite of the fact that since 2009, health-care spending has held constant at 17.9% of the economy. In absolute dollar figures, health-care spending has still been growing — it grew 3.9% last year — but so has the overall economy, so that the difference in its share of the economy in recent years has been negligible. But as the country emerges from its current economic slump, CMS forecasts that health-related spending will accelerate once again — reaching a growth rate as high as 7.4% in 2014.

Only a small fraction of this predicted growth in health spending — an increase of 0.1% over current levels — will come from expanded health coverage through the Affordable Care Act, which CMS estimates will reach 30 million people. This additional cost is so small because people without health insurance often receive expensive care in emergency rooms, and the cost of care for the uninsured is currently borne largely by private insurance policyholders (in the form of higher premiums) and by taxpayers.

Most of the predicted growth in spending, then, comes not from the health law but from an aging population that will require more care, and from people returning to their pre-recession health-care spending habits. As a Wall Street Journal column noted last week, some health policy experts disagree that spending will shoot up once the recession ends. One reason spending might grow more modestly is that the share of insured workers with a policy deductable of $1,000 or higher rose from 18% in 2008 to 31% in 2011, according to the column. Naturally, when more money is coming directly from their pockets, people are more reluctant to visit the doctor or to undergo nonessential procedures. The growth of spending on imaging procedures, such as MRIs and CT scans, has seen a distinct drop. Of course, people may lose some peace of mind — if not actual medical benefit — by forgoing these procedures. Meanwhile, prescription-drug costs have dropped as more drugs lose their patent protection and are available in generic versions.

What do you think — is it a bad thing for health care to consume an ever-growing share of the economy? If so, how should this trend be reversed — should the government mandate that insurance providers pay health-care providers a lump sum to treat a condition, to limit unnecessary procedures? Should Medicare pay doctors the same way, or pay them less? Should more money be devoted to preventive health programs, even though most haven’t been shown to save money in the long run? Is “Medicare for all” the answer? Leave a comment below!

POST A COMMENT       
  

Comments
  1. I believe it is too early to tell. CMS has or will cut reimbursements for dialysis, oncology services, and I am sure there will be more cost reductions forced on doctors.

    Is this right? Maybe. There is more that needs analysis. Is it right that hospitals have been given a free pass from antitrust? When will hospital overcharges be stopped and penalized? Under current regulations, hospitals seem to have full access at the money bin. Heads of hospitals are doubling their salaries and others are being highly overpaid.

    With the push to cut costs, elderly patients and patients without advocates having a chronic disease will be on the chopping block and euthanasia will become the cost cutting tool of choice for hospitals.

    It won’t be doom and gloom for everyone, but many people are going to suffer under CMS and HHS rule.
    Just my 2 centavos.

    Posted by Bob Fenton |
  2. The cost of health care may rise or not; we have to wait and see. It really depends on who is behind the articles written. We have a ’shadow government’ that will say anything to try to eliminate ACA and put Medicare on a voucher system. Ridiculous!

    When I was a child bread was 15 cents a loaf. Since then I have watched the cost of everything slowly crawl upwards.

    Posted by joan |
  3. Health is very important because this is the only thing that we have in order for us to live. Now, if this the case that cost of our needs are rising, how can we meet the needs of our health? Just come to think of it.

    Posted by Susie Fe Armentano |
  4. Thanks for sharing

    Posted by tamil |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of R.A. Rapaport Publishing, Inc., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.


Flashpoints
Doctor Payments Revealed (04/16/14)
The Costs of Innovation (04/09/14)
Diabetes to Go (04/02/14)
Veggie Persuasion (03/26/14)

 

 

Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.


Carbohydrate Restriction: An Option for Diabetes Management
Some people find that decreasing the amount of carbohydrate they eat can help with blood glucose control. Here’s what to know about this approach.

Insulin Patch Pumps: A New Tool for Type 2
Patch pumps are simpler to operate than traditional insulin pumps and may be a good option for some people with Type 2 diabetes who need insulin.

How Much Do You Know About Vitamins?
Learn what these micronutrients can and can’t do for you.

Complete table of contents
Get a FREE ISSUE
Subscription questions