Diabetes Self-Management Blog

A couple of months ago, we discussed a proposed US Department of Agriculture (USDA) rule that would have limited starchy vegetables, such as potatoes and corn, counting as vegetable servings under the National School Lunch Program. The proposal — part of a nutrition requirement overhaul mandated by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 — stated that only two half-cup servings of starchy vegetables per week could count as vegetable servings. This change was meant to prod schools into serving a wider range of vegetables — especially dark orange and leafy green ones, which would have gotten new minimum serving requirements. Currently, many schools serve French fries as a way to fulfill federal vegetable requirements. Furthermore, the USDA proposed that half a cup of tomato paste, rather than just two tablespoons, be required to count as a vegetable serving so that frozen pizza (without any vegetable toppings) could no longer count as a vegetable.

But last week, in a spending bill covering the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Justice, Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, Congress did away with these requirements by stating that no money could be used to implement them. As described in a Reuters article, the first blow to the new rules came in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives (where all spending bills must originate) when a subcommittee of the Appropriations Committee inserted language into the bill that blocked their funding. Rep. Sam Farr of California, the leading Democrat on the panel, objected to interfering with the USDA’s rules, according to the article. Nevertheless, he supported the overall spending bill, as did most members of both parties. The full House voted only on the overall spending bill, not on individual contents like blocking the USDA rules.

Then in the Senate, a bipartisan group of senators led by Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, proposed an amendment blocking funds for any rule that “sets any maximum limits on the serving of vegetables in school meal programs.” According to an article at Produce News Daily, Sen. Collins declared on the Senate floor that “a school could not have served a baked potato and an ear of fresh corn in the same week” under the USDA’s proposed rules, calling this “an absurd result.” This amendment was mostly just a political statement, since the bill already contained the House’s language denying funding for the USDA’s proposed rules. It was approved by voice vote, without individual votes recorded. The overall bill then passed overwhelmingly, and President Obama signed it into law.

As the Reuters article notes, the House was heavily lobbied by the food industry to prevent the USDA from taking action — particularly by the American Frozen Food Institute (AFFI), which represents manufacturers of both pizza and French fries. An AFFI spokesman noted the group’s opposition to rules that “force companies … to change their products in a way that would make them unpalatable to students.” The Senate amendment was cosponsored largely by senators from farm states, where potato farmers may be an important constituency.

What do you think — was Congress right to block rules leading to “an absurd result,” or standing in the way of better school nutrition? Would students eat more leafy green and orange vegetables if they were served, or would most of them simply throw them out, as some opponents of the USDA rules claimed? Should President Obama have signed the overall spending bill? Leave a comment below!

POST A COMMENT       
  

Comments
  1. I would like to know what makes Congress click these days! Many members of Congress have become more mystifying every day! If it were not for the USDA I would be hard pressed to know what nutrients were in any food choices as a Type 1 diabetic. Their nutrient site is truly very close to accurate; nothing is perfect of course.

    This specific choice of veggies, if that is the real story, is ridiculous. One green and one yellow veggies per day should not contribute to gaining weight or poor health. Now what we put on the green or yello veggie may make a big difference like too much salt, mayo, catchup etc!

    I would hope too, that parents (even though both work) could help their children to understand how important nutrients are to their health. If our sons and daughter can understand how to Tweak, Twitter, and use the computer at many levels they can understand the importance of nutrients. The catch is to get their attention!

    We can not depend on Congress at the moment to do much that is sensible.

    Posted by joan |
  2. Congress has more pressing problems to take care of along with the president. We don’t need them to tell us what to eat — we have experts for that and they are not politicians. At this rate we will soon become a nanny country where we can’t do anything unless Congress mandates it. With the way the country is now it’s proof that the government is doing a poor job.

    Posted by Ferne |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of R.A. Rapaport Publishing, Inc., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.


Flashpoints
Doctor Payments Revealed (04/16/14)
The Costs of Innovation (04/09/14)
Diabetes to Go (04/02/14)
Veggie Persuasion (03/26/14)

 

 

Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.


Carbohydrate Restriction: An Option for Diabetes Management
Some people find that decreasing the amount of carbohydrate they eat can help with blood glucose control. Here’s what to know about this approach.

Insulin Patch Pumps: A New Tool for Type 2
Patch pumps are simpler to operate than traditional insulin pumps and may be a good option for some people with Type 2 diabetes who need insulin.

How Much Do You Know About Vitamins?
Learn what these micronutrients can and can’t do for you.

Complete table of contents
Get a FREE ISSUE
Subscription questions