Diabetes Self-Management Blog

For people with diabetic macular edema, injections of the drug ranibizumab (brand name Lucentis) in combination with laser therapy result in better eyesight than laser therapy alone, according to new government-funded research. Macular edema, which affects nearly 30% of people who have had diabetes for at least 20 years, is a swelling of the portion of the eye responsible for central vision and is a leading cause of blindness in American adults.

Since 1985, the standard treatment for diabetic macular edema has been laser therapy of the retina, the light-sensing structure of the eye that includes the macula. Recent small studies, however, have indicated a benefit to injecting medicines that block vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), such as ranibizumab, into the eye. (VEGF is a chemical that stimulates blood vessel growth.)

To determine whether laser therapy, anti-VEGF injections, or some combination of the two is the most effective treatment for diabetic macular edema, researchers evaluated 854 eyes in 691 people who had been diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes and macular edema. Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of four treatments: placebo injections plus prompt (within a week) laser therapy, ranibizumab injections plus prompt laser therapy, ranibizumab injections plus laser treatment administered at least six months later, or injections of the corticosteroid triamcinolone (Trivaris) plus prompt laser treatment.

In general, the treatments continued until each person’s vision improved or retinal thickness returned to normal, or until further treatment did not improve vision or retinal thickness. Injections of ranibizumab could be given once every four weeks; injections of triamcinolone could be given once every 16 weeks.

After one year, almost 50% of the eyes treated with ranibizumab and either prompt or delayed laser therapy had significantly improved vision, represented by the ability to read at least two additional lines on an eye chart. Fewer than 5% of the eyes that had received one of these treatments had a visual loss of two or more lines. Comparatively, roughly 30% of people receiving a placebo injection and laser therapy or a triamcinolone injection with laser therapy could read at least two additional lines on an eye chart, while 13% to 14% of the eyes in these groups had a visual loss of two or more lines.

Participants in each of the three groups that received either ranibizumab or triamcinolone injections and laser treatment experienced decreased retinal thickness compared with people who had received placebo injections along with laser treatment. However, people receiving triamcinolone had more complications such as high eye pressure requiring medicine and cataracts requiring surgery, while those receiving ranibizumab had fewer complications such as eye infection or worsening of a preexisting retinal detachment.

According to Neil M. Bressler, MD, chief of the Retina Division at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, “These results indicate a treatment breakthrough for saving the vision of people with diabetic macular edema. Eye injections of ranibizumab with prompt or deferred laser treatment should now be considered for patients with characteristics similar to those in this clinical trial.” A physician from the National Eye Institute noted that ranibizumab represents the first new treatment for diabetic macular edema “in a quarter of a century.”

Ranibizumab is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of diabetic macular edema, but it is approved for age-related macular degeneration, so doctors may prescribe it off-label for macular edema.

Researchers will be following the participants for at least three years to obtain further information about the safety and the long-term effectiveness of the various treatments.

To learn more, read the articles “Diabetic Macular Edema: Ranibizumab Injections Plus Laser Therapy Results in Dramatic Visual Improvement” or “A Genetech Eye Treatment Is Found to Help Prevent Vision Loss in Diabetics,” or see the study’s abstract in the journal Ophthalmology.

POST A COMMENT       
  

Comments
  1. Ranibizumab (Luncentis) and its predecessor, Avastin, have been injected into my eyes for several years now to treat diabetic macular edema. The results have been remarkable. My right eye has improved from 20/400 to 20/75 and my left eye has returned to 20/20 from 20/60. More importantly, the progression of the disease seems to have abated if not ceased. My right retina still has significant swelling; my left, less so. My right eye had a retinal membrane peel and vitreous surgically replaced about two years ago, and both external and endoscope laser treatment of the right eye. Of course, much of my leakage is in the macula and therefore not subject to laser treatment. Lastly, I am a “hot reactor” to steroid injections, taking 6 months to reduce my pressure to normal ranges after the initial steroid injection. I have begun usage of a continuous glucose monitor in conjunction with an insulin pump to better control my Type 1 diabetes and hopefully become less reliant on pharmacological advancements for my long-term vision, although I am grateful for what Lucentis (and my Bascom-Palmer trained physician!)has done for me.

    Posted by Orlando Tom |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of Madavor Media, LLC., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.


Eyes & Vision
Focus on This: May Is Healthy Vision Month (05/14/13)
Drug Improves Vision in Diabetic Retinopathy (11/30/12)
Diabetes and Your Eyes — More Than Retinopathy (05/24/13)
FDA Approves Drug for Diabetes-Related Vision Loss (08/24/12)

Diabetic Complications
New Approach for Neuropathy Pain? (08/18/14)
Study Evaluating Treatment for Neuropathy Pain (07/08/14)
Good Control Now = Lifetime Benefit (06/25/14)
What You Need to Know About UTIs (03/24/14)

Diabetes Research
Pistachios Offer Protection for People With Diabetes (08/29/14)
New Approach for Neuropathy Pain? (08/18/14)
Metformin Study Currently Recruiting (08/19/14)
FDA Approves New Oral Drug for Type 2 Diabetes (08/07/14)

Diabetes News
Pistachios Offer Protection for People With Diabetes (08/29/14)
New Approach for Neuropathy Pain? (08/18/14)
FDA Approves New Oral Drug for Type 2 Diabetes (08/07/14)
Shift Work Tied to Increased Type 2 Diabetes Risk (07/31/14)

Diane Fennell
Pistachios Offer Protection for People With Diabetes (08/29/14)
New Approach for Neuropathy Pain? (08/18/14)
New Metformin Combo Drug Approved for Type 2 Diabetes (08/13/14)
FDA Approves New Oral Drug for Type 2 Diabetes (08/07/14)

 

 

Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.