Diabetes Self-Management Blog

Surprise! I — and various other diabetes bloggers — were right. Ever since results from the ACCORD study were released last year, some in the media and the medical establishment have been reporting that strict blood glucose control is bad for people with diabetes.

ACCORD stands for Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes. The study found that people assigned to the intensive blood glucose control group had more deaths from cardiovascular causes than those in the standard control group. The researchers and much of the media presented the results with stories that blared: “Low blood sugar causes heart deaths! The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and United Kingdom Diabetes Prevention Study (UKPDS) were wrong! We need to be much looser about glucose control and more aggressive in treating hypertension and cholesterol!”

Since then, at least two more major studies have come out making similar claims. The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) and the ADVANCE trial both found that lowering HbA1c to 6.5% didn’t reduce cardiovascular risk or risk of certain complications or death as compared to an A1C of 8% or so. A possible conclusion to draw from these studies: tight control doesn’t help.

But as I keep pointing out, the means of tight control in all these trials was the same — piling on more drugs. And as Drs. Victor M. Montori, MD, MSc, and Mercè Fernández-Balsells, MD, wrote in a recent Annals of Internal Medicine article, these drugs put the burdens of costs, side effects, management, and hypoglycemia on patients.

In some critics’ views, the drugs, not the low A1C numbers, were causing the extra deaths. Now a study out of the American Diabetes Association’s 69th Scientific Sessions begins to confirm some of these suspicions.

The original researchers went back through the ACCORD patient records to determine the causes of death. According to an article in Reuters, Dr. Denise Bonds, one of the ACCORD investigators, told reporters that hypoglycemia was likely not the cause. “Now,” says the article, “researchers are looking to other factors, such as drug combinations or age, as potential reasons for the deaths.”

Gee, you think? I mean, some of the drugs used in these studies for tight control, such as Avandia (rosiglitazone), are known to increase the risk of certain heart problems. So how come they blamed the tight control instead? Are some “experts” starting to realize that drugs aren’t the answer to everything in diabetes? That maybe we shouldn’t be loading older, sicker people down with intensive treatments, and should focus instead on well being and self-management?

I like what Drs. Montori and Balsells wrote: (Apologies — scientific language coming…) “Clinicians should prioritize supporting well-being and healthy lifestyles, preventive care, and cardiovascular risk reduction… Given that patients with diabetes often have [other] conditions, clinicians should avoid glycemic control interventions that overwhelm the patients’ capacity to cope clinically, psychologically, and financially…”

“Keeping the HbA1c level between 7% and 7.5% seems reasonable and feasible for many patients… Glycemic targets can be adjusted up or down according to the burden of treatment; side effects; and the patient’s context, values, and preferences. Given the possibility that tighter control may be beneficial, some patients who are less concerned about downsides, and are ready to do whatever may possibly help, may choose tighter control.”

What do you think? Does this approach make sense to you? Remember, there are other ways besides drugs of achieving control — things like stress reduction, physical activity, better eating, and emotional and spiritual healing. And changing from overdoing drugs for blood glucose to overdoing drugs for cholesterol or blood pressure is not likely to help. Does any of this change your thinking, your plans, or your goals for self-management? Please let us know by commenting here.

And Now for Something Completely Different
Diabetes alert dogs are becoming all the rage. Apparently, dogs can differentiate the smell of a person with low, normal, or high blood glucose. They can be trained to warn their owners if their glucose is too high or too low.

A report on some Illinois television stations told about a nine-year-old girl with Type 1 named Allison. Her service poodle Keony has prevented the seizures Allison used to suffer when her glucose got low. “He will eat my hair if I’m high,” says Allison, “and either paw at me or lick me if I’m low.”

Couldn’t we all use a dog like that? If you’re interested, contact the Delta Society or look up “diabetes service dogs” on an Internet search engine such as Google.

High Glucose = Low Testosterone
The Endocrine Society’s 2009 meeting in Washington, DC, reported on the results of a study of 74 men, some with normal blood glucose and some with prediabetes or newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. Each man drank a glucose solution, then had his testosterone levels tested. Whether the men had diabetes or not, their testosterone level dropped as much as 25% after they drank the glucose, and it stayed down for more than two hours. So if you’re having problems with sex drive or function, one thing to consider is getting glucose levels down.

POST A COMMENT       
  

Comments
  1. Dear David.

    I have always believed that keeping the BG as close to normal as possible is the way to go.

    One possible counter argument could be that it may contribute to weight gain and if you are insulin resistant and on tight control with more and more insulin this will be a loosing positive feed back loop. It may be that suboptimal control of the BG may be needed to avoid increasing the insulin resistance. I think it is desirable to keep your insulin comsumption to 0.6 units per day per Kg of body weight or less. If you use more you may really gain weight.

    Another issue is that if you have cardiac insufficiency will the occaisional low that will be more frequent with thight control cause more heart damage?

    Anybody have any thoughts on these 2 issues?

    Posted by CalgaryDiabetic |
  2. David,

    Reading this in combination with your comment on Eric’s blog about “overdoctoring” really makes some sense. It’s important for people to get the message that there isn’t a magic pill that makes it easy to avoid medical complications. Instead, sometimes drugs might be necessary but they should be used in conjunction with hard work (but sustainable effort) from patients (diet, exercise, monitoring). It’s equally important that people get the message that just because one study showed a risk from tight control, it’s not an excuse to just allow tight control to slip, but it’s a call to managing tight control appropriately.

    Thanks for the info.

    Erik

    Posted by Erik |

Post a Comment

Note: All comments are moderated and there may be a delay in the publication of your comment. Please be on-topic and appropriate. Do not disclose personal information. Be respectful of other posters. Only post information that is correct and true to your knowledge. When referencing information that is not based on personal experience, please provide links to your sources. All commenters are considered to be nonmedical professionals unless explicitly stated otherwise. Promotion of your own or someone else's business or competing site is not allowed: Sharing links to sites that are relevant to the topic at hand is permitted, but advertising is not. Once submitted, comments cannot be modified or deleted by their authors. Comments that don't follow the guidelines above may be deleted without warning. Such actions are at the sole discretion of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. Comments are moderated Monday through Friday by the editors of DiabetesSelfManagement.com. The moderators are employees of R.A. Rapaport Publishing, Inc., and do not report any conflicts of interest. A privacy policy setting forth our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of certain information relating to you and your use of this Web site can be found here. For more information, please read our Terms and Conditions.


Type 2 Diabetes
Study on Factors Influencing Type 2 Management (04/15/14)
What's Your Diabetes "Type"? Gestational, MODY, and Steroid-Induced (04/15/14)
Overweight People With Type 2 May Benefit From Gastric Banding (04/11/14)
What's Your Diabetes "Type"? Type 1, Type 2, and LADA (04/07/14)

Heart Health
Heart Health Fact or Fiction (02/18/14)
Symptoms of a Heart Attack in Women (02/14/14)
Giving Your Heart a Helping Hand (02/10/14)
Metformin Affects Hearts of Men and Women Differently (01/03/14)

Diabetic Complications
What You Need to Know About UTIs (03/24/14)
Mediterranean Diet Linked to Lower Risk of PAD (02/12/14)
Don't Call My Liver Fat! (12/16/13)
Neuropathy Common in Young Adults (12/13/13)

Diabetes Research
Overweight People With Type 2 May Benefit From Gastric Banding (04/11/14)
Good News About Good Diabetes Self-Management (03/28/14)
Diabetes Developed at Midlife May Affect Brain Function in Old Age (03/21/14)
Many Americans Taking Meds That Work Against Each Other (03/14/14)

 

 

Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.


Carbohydrate Restriction: An Option for Diabetes Management
Some people find that decreasing the amount of carbohydrate they eat can help with blood glucose control. Here’s what to know about this approach.

Insulin Patch Pumps: A New Tool for Type 2
Patch pumps are simpler to operate than traditional insulin pumps and may be a good option for some people with Type 2 diabetes who need insulin.

How Much Do You Know About Vitamins?
Learn what these micronutrients can and can’t do for you.

Complete table of contents
Get a FREE ISSUE
Subscription questions