Diabetes Self-Management Blog

In my book, Diabetes: Sugar-coated Crisis, I made the case that most dietary advice is strongly influenced by the food industry. If I had known then what I know now, I would have made an even stronger case.

A November 25 article from The Philadelphia Inquirer reports several cases of health “authorities” who are paid by food industry sources.

  • Lisa Hark, a widely quoted nutritionist and author, received more than $24,000 from the Florida citrus industry for six months of work, during which she endorsed orange juice as a cold fighter in TV and print interviews. Hark’s Web site describes her as “a media expert to help promote and market your company.”
  • David Allison was tapped to be president of the Obesity Society, a research and advocacy group, while a “paid consultant for the New York state restaurant industry as it fought a proposal to list calories on menu boards.” After strong criticism, Allison dropped the consultancy before taking over at the Obesity Society, but still…
  • The American Dietetic Association (the “other ADA”) has received many millions from food industry sources. The Dietetic Association markets itself to food industries. For $20,000, the ADA will print a “nutrition fact sheet” about your product in its journal, perforated so it can be torn off for “patient education.” According to Inquirer staff writer Tom Avril, “One sheet touts the purported benefits of chewing gum, such as the relief of ‘life’s everyday stresses.’ Its sponsor: the Wrigley Science Institute.” The ADA says all information in the fact sheets is scientifically accurate, but I don’t trust them…
  • Six of 13 “experts” on the federal government’s dietary guidelines review board have taken food or drug industry money.

If there’s one thing I have learned from the last few years of research, it’s this. Science is a rigged game. It’s not an objective search for truth; it’s a way of finding the truths that meet the sponsors’ needs. This might make you think twice about advice like the “eggs are bad for you” study I reported a couple of weeks ago. Never respond to one study or one “authority,” even if it’s your doctor. Find multiple sources; then decide. We’re lucky to live in a time when it’s fairly easy to do such research.

Happy holidays to everyone! It’s been great sharing with you and reading your comments in 2008. See you next year, or visit me at www.davidsperorn.com.


We are currently experiencing technical difficulties with our commenting system. Thank you for your patience as we work to resolve them.

Nutrition & Meal Planning
Eating to Lower Insulin Needs (12/09/14)
Sugar-Free Labels Can Be Deceptive (12/02/14)
My Battle With the Glycemic Index (11/25/14)
A Short Fast for the Holidays (11/18/14)

General Diabetes & Health Issues
Take Five for Better Health (12/22/14)
Holiday Aftermath: Getting Back on Track (12/01/14)
Getting to Sleep and Staying There (09/24/14)
How Much Do You Know About Diabetes? Six Facts to Get You Thinking (08/25/14)



Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.